77 . Const. P. 3670/2023 (D.B.) Rehan Pervez V/S Fed. of Pakistan and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the instant Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based around the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued on the petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement during the FIR lodged by FIA and from the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

The focus is within the intention to cause injury. This is actually a major problem: an extremely lower threshold for an offence carrying the death penalty.

116 . Const. P. 469/2022 (D.B.) Zain Ahmed V/S The I.G of Police and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi In the instant case, the guidelines as set forth would not use, as the criminal Court has not convicted the petitioner, alternatively he has actually been acquitted with the criminal charges based on evidence and it can be perfectly-settled legislation that once the civil servant is acquitted while in the criminal case, then on this quite charge he cannot be awarded in any punishment because of the department and held him disqualified for the post because acquittal for all potential purposes. The aforesaid proposition has become set at naught through the Supreme Court of Pakistan from the case on the District Police Officer Mainwali and a pair of others v.

Note: Please fill any discipline and Click on Search button, If you don't know the complete information please leave field blank.

94 . Const. P. 256/2025 (D.B.) Hafeezullah V/S Govt of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi It really is nicely-settled that the civil servants must first pursue internal appeals within ninety times. In the event the appeal is just not decided within that timeframe, he/she will then solution the service tribunal to challenge the original order. Once they are doing so, the Tribunal must decide the appeal on merits and cannot merely direct the department to decide it, because the ninety times for the department to act has already expired. To the aforesaid proposition, we're guided by the decision with the Supreme Court within the case of Dr.

eighty two . Const. P. 6193/2016 (D.B.) Syed Musawar Shah V/S M.D CSD and Ors Sindh High Court, Karachi First and foremost, we would address the issue of maintainability of the moment Petition under Article 199 in the Constitution based on the doctrine of laches as this petition was filed website in 2016, whereas the alleged cause of action accrued to your petitioner in 1992. The petitioner asserts that he pursued his legal remedy just after involvement within the FIR lodged by FIA and during the intervening period the respondent dismissed him from service where after he preferred petition No.

148 . Const. P. 8180/2019 (D.B.) Saif Shujaat and Ors V/S Govt. of Sindh & Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Offered the legal analysis on the topic issue, we're with the view that the claim from the petitioners for retroactive regularization from their Preliminary contract appointment and promotion thereon, from that angle is not really legally audio, Moreover promotion and seniority, not absolute rights, They may be subject matter to rules and regulations if the recruitment rules of the subject post allow the case of the petitioners for promotion could be thought of, however, we are crystal clear in our point of view that contractual service cannot be thought of for seniority and promotion because the seniority is reckoned from the date of standard appointment and promotion depends upon seniority cum Physical fitness, subject matter to availability of vacancy issue to the approval in the competent authority. Read more

Extra username and password are necessary for this resource. See Username and password webpage for details

On June 16, 1999, a lawsuit was filed on behalf on the boy by a guardian ad litem, against DCFS, the social worker, as well as therapist. A similar lawsuit was also filed on behalf with the Roe’s victimized son by a different guardian advertisement litem. The defendants petitioned the trial court for any dismissal based on absolute immunity, as they were all performing in their Work with DCFS.

Justia – an extensive resource for federal and state statutory laws, along with case regulation at both the federal and state levels.

Should the employee fails to serve a grievance notice, the NIRC could dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't experienced a chance to answer the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In some cases, the NIRC could allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is frequently only accomplished If your employee can show that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. From the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence and also the petitioner company responded towards the allegations therefore they were properly conscious of the allegations and led the evidence therefore this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

this Court is still left with no option but to direct the respondents to inform the promotion in the petitioner in next rank .(Promotion)

Try to look for websites affiliated with reputable legal institutions or organizations. Verify the information against other sources when achievable.

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a twelve-year aged boy from his home to protect him from the Awful physical and sexual abuse he experienced endured in his home, and to prevent him from abusing other children during the home. The boy was placed within an unexpected emergency foster home, and was later shifted about within the foster care system.